As A Man, I’d Just Like To Say This

Posted by

We’re told nowadays male novelists need to pretend to be women. Or we hear they need at least for readers not to know they are men. (Meaning their first name should not reveal their sex.) Or we’re informed only women can really write women characters women will read.

Screen capture of the Guardian.
Screen capture of the Guardian.

The reverse can also be the case. The best-known attempt to mask the sex of an author in recent years was when it became “J.K.” rather than “Joanne” Rowling. Her publisher feared boys might not read the books if they knew a woman had written them.

However, she became so famous and in that fame it naturally also became common knowledge she was a woman, that it’s hard to know how large a part the “J.K.” played, but as it turned out her boy wizard tales may have been read by a slightly higher percentage of boys than girls. For example, one study found 57 percent of boys and 51 percent of girls said they’d read Harry Potter. Yet given the gazillion number of books she sold, she’d have sold roughly only half a gazillion if they’d been read either mostly by girls or mostly by boys. Looking again at those numbers too, if you think about it she actually did pretty well with “gender balance.”

But that’s kids. Early on, knowing I wasn’t writing “World War Whatever,” or a wizard tale, or a vampire book, but a fictionalized historical romance travel memoir, I “listened” to articles like that Guardian piece. I decided to use my initials “R. J.” rather than “Robert.” I figured it would be prudent to play down whether I was a male or a female. After all, why not?

Passports (Part 1), Frontiers (Part 2), Distances (upcoming Part 3).
Passports (Part 1), Frontiers (Part 2), Distances (upcoming Part 3).

But when Passports appeared, I decided not to try to “hide” behind the initials. I decided my novels (I knew there would be more) are my novels as they are: they have both major males and major females. So, here on social media, I made it plain from the outset: I’m a man. (I use the “R.J.” now for publishing consistency.)

I have no breakdown on my readers by their sex. Over time I have learned anecdotally that, yes, quite of few of those who read my novels are women. But some readers are men too.

On one male author’s decision, that Guardian article also notes:

A Goodreads survey from 2014 suggests the instinct to mask his gender is a right one. It found, for example, that women are predominantly read by women – 80% of a new female author’s audience is likely to be female.

And that seems to bulldoze my position. However, it is worth bearing in mind that the “novel-reading” audience is overwhelmingly female to begin with. So saying women read women authors is hardly a shocker given most readers are women.

If women are reading my novels and know I’m a man, I feel I must be doing okay anyhow. Moreover to assert that being a man, and it being known I’m a man, I couldn’t write a fictionalized memoir that includes the fictionalized women who are central to the basis of the tale? That’s ludicrous.

Readers are a lot smarter than “the powers that be” give them credit for. Trying to “hide” an author’s sex ultimately leaves us nowhere anyway. For unless it’s a wholly “segregated” tale, in every story it’s inevitable a male author must write women characters and a female author must write men.

Or should J.K. Rowling not have written, say, “Dumbledore,” because he was a male character and she’s a woman?

In the end, we’re all humans anyway.

Have a good Tuesday, wherever you are in the world. πŸ™‚


  1. Of course women read more than men, and if they didn’t, novels would be dead, “Robert” πŸ™‚ On the other hand, while the NYT best sellers fiction list is dominated by women authors, the non-fiction list is predominantly male, and they tend to stay on the best sellers list longer, I think..

    You can tell Harry Potter was written by a woman BTW. But her genius was to make her book attractive to boys. It would not have sold as well if it were titled “Harriet Potter”.

    I thank my mother for passing on to me her love of reading, so I do my share as a male reader who reads men AND women. But I make sure my daughters read Orwell, Hemingway, Huxley, Heller, and PG Wodehouse.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Quite a good point: women have always been bigger novel readers than men. That is indeed so.

      I have to admit I have not read Potter.

      Suddenly, I recall seeing that F. Scott Fitzgerald had felt The Great Gatsby was initially not a huge hit because it did not contain (in his opinion) any really good women characters. Fitzgerald had felt women were his main audience. And that was 1925.

      Ha, “Harriet Potter!” πŸ™‚

      Liked by 1 person

  2. “In the end, we’re all humans anyway.” Hear! Hear! πŸ™‚

    I was raised in a nuclear family with just one sister, and my extended family includes only two male cousins (one a few years older than I, one about ten years younger), but I do have the experience of raising three sons, which clearly demonstrated that there’s the same kind of Sturm und Drang to be found in the hearts and minds of males as there is in those of females, for writers of both sexes to mine for fictional character development and POV. (Hello, experts? Have you ever heard of “the human condition?”)

    Perhaps the presumed ethnicity of an author plays a bigger role, vis-Γ -vis the premise of a story, than the author’s sex. For example, if I had dreamed up a Gaelic pseudonym, instead of publishing Irish Firebrands under my own exotic-looking French surname, maybe people would think I was “qualified” to have written it, and the book would sell more briskly. But because I have exactly 50% Gallic blood (the other half is Polish Slavic), I’m at least that much of a Continental Celt, which may make me more Celtic than many people who have Irish surnames.

    BTW, I haven’t read the Potter series, either.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I love it that a two and a half year old blog post, written two (of my) books ago, still has relevancy!

      I think the “identity” of an author, be it their sex or race or nationality, or whatever, is unfortunately becoming more and more of an issue in the publishing world – as if any or all of those or some combination demonstrate the author’s “authority to speak” on what they write. I don’t have time for that stuff. I write my fiction books and they are there to be read by anyone anywhere. And that’s that.

      And I still haven’t read any of Potter. πŸ˜‚

      Liked by 1 person

Further thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s